In the latest of a sweeping series of cost-cutting restructures across the public sector, the Ministry for the Environment today announced plans deleting 303 roles by July next year – about 30 per cent of 993 positions filled currently. Photo / Mark Mitchell
The Ministry for the Environment’s workforce is set to be slashed by a third, in proposed cuts a union says will jeopardise vital work on combating climate change and cleaning up our rivers.
In the latest of a sweeping series of cost-cutting restructures across the public sector, the ministry today announced plans deleting 303 roles by July next year – about 30 per cent of 993 positions filled currently.
The cuts – put to staff for consultation from today – would be partly met by ending about 150 fixed-term contracts by October 31.
The rest would come through voluntary redundancy – which 45 employees have already taken up – and proposed redundancies of permanent staff, with a number of these delayed until June next year.
Ministry chief executive James Palmer said that, before the change of government, and after a period of “rapid growth”, the ministry was on track to shrink by a quarter over the next few years, as time-limited funding for waste, water and resource management programmes came to an end.
“Throughout 2023 we took steps to prepare for that decline, instituting a hiring freeze last year, and employing a number of people on fixed term contracts,” Palmer said.
“We also reviewed our operating model, finishing the year with a structure designed to make the ministry more effective and efficient, with a smaller number of senior management roles.”
Nevertheless, he acknowledged the changes proposed today would be tough on many staff, who’d delivered “high quality and specialised work.
“My focus as we enter three weeks of consultation, is on ensuring our people feel they are being treated fairly, are well supported, and have access to clear information on which to base their next decisions.”
The Public Service Association has hit out against the flagged cuts – arguing they made “no sense”.
“In the face of climate change impacting communities, our freshwaters being degraded, and our unique biodiversity under threat like never before, the Government is gutting the very agency on the frontline tackling these challenges,” the union’s national secretary, Duane Leo, said.
He accused the Government of “turning a blind eye” to the country’s environmental challenges, “and again ignoring the evidence of its own experts so it can fund tax cuts”.
The union noted last week’s Budget slashed the ministry’s funding by $316 million, with impacts on programmes across climate change, freshwater protection, waste minimisation, biodiversity and environmental reporting, as well as funding for the Climate Change Commission.
“The very people charged with monitoring environment standards and analysing data are also under threat in this proposal,” Leo said.
“The Government promised evidence-based policy, but clearly does not value the gathering of evidence to help us better safeguard the environment.”
The Herald has approached the offices of Public Service Minister Nicola Willis and Environment Minister Penny Simmonds for comment.
Separately, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) told NZME it was working toward cutting costs to reach a break-even position next financial year – representing a saving of $4m per financial year.
“Options are being considered by the EPA’s leadership and Board in June,” a spokesperson said.
The authority was looking at areas where spending could be reduced – and it had already moved to cut its use of external consultants, restricted new hires, down-scaled some programmes and sought to limit its sought to limit our long-term investments programme.
Since late last year, it had disestablished one position, which wasn’t related to the government’s cost savings directive.
“We currently have 32 vacant positions. Most of these roles will not be filled.”
The latest cuts come after NZME reported how leaked documents suggested the squeeze on the public sector would go well beyond the Budget.
Agencies have been chasing cost-savings of between 6.5 and 7.5 per cent on average – some finding less and some slashing more, to strike the Government’s desired balance.
Agencies under the latter directive are tasked with cutting more from their budgets if their staff numbers have seen a more significant increase since 2017.
Jamie Morton is a specialist in science and environmental reporting. He joined the Herald in 2011 and writes about everything from conservation and climate change to natural hazards and new technology.