Sunday, December 22, 2024

Fortescue accuses two former executives of ‘industrial-scale misuse’ of its intellectual property

Must read

The court summary also names a third person connected with Element Zero, Bjorn Winther-Jensen.

Element Zero has foreshadowed an application to set aside the search orders. Justice Logan said the application for and execution of the search orders could turn into an “industrial-scale forensic debacle”.

Andrew Forrest’s Fortescue Group has accused two former executives of “industrial-scale misuse” of its intellectual property.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen

“Element Zero believes this legal action is entirely without merit and welcomes the opportunity to respond to Fortescue’s spurious claims. Our response will include an application to vary or set aside the original search orders,” the company said.

“As Element Zero will demonstrate, its green metals technology was developed independently of and is very different from anything that Fortescue is doing or has done in this space. We continue to rapidly advance our technology. As the matter is now before the court, we will not be making further comment at this time,” it added.

Masterman and Kolodziejczyk want to build a $US2.1 billion ($3.2 billion) green iron ore processing plant in the Pilbara within five years. They raised $US10 million from investors at the start of the year and have plans for another capital raising later in the year, targeting $US50 million to $US100 million.

Loading

Fortescue said it was leading the world in developing the cutting-edge solutions to decarbonise its Australian iron ore operations by the end of the decade, and helping the world avert the worst impacts of climate change.

“As a first mover, our intellectual property is critical to our ongoing success in this pursuit and must be protected at all times,” a spokesperson said.

“We invest significant resources in creating IP and are committed to vigorously managing and enforcing its protection. As the matter is the subject of legal proceedings, we do not intend to comment further at this stage,” they said.

Justice Logan’s summary is the only court document available in the case. Hearings are set to resume later this month.

“What needs to be made pellucid is that there is no determination whatsoever of the merits of the claims made by the Fortescue parties, or, for that matter, the riposte which has thus far been made on behalf of the respondents,” Justice Logan said.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Latest article