Saturday, November 9, 2024

An actor of the anti-establishment, Donald Sutherland, dies aged 88

Must read

Canadian actor Donald Sutherland, one of the most significant figures of his radicalized generation, died in Miami on June 20. Sutherland remains best known for roles in The Dirty Dozen (1967), M*A*S*H (1970) and Kelly’s Heroes (1970), along with Klute (1971), Don’t Look Now (1973), 1900 (1976), Fellini’s Casanova (1976) and Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978). More recently, he played a significant part in The Hunger Games series. In all, he made some 200 film and television appearances.

Born in Saint John, New Brunswick, Sutherland attended university in Toronto before leaving for England in 1957, where he began studying at the London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art. He dropped out after a year and moved to Scotland, where he worked with the Perth Repertory Theatre for 18 months. He once told the BBC that the biggest change he had noticed over his career was that actors were now making “a lot of money.”

“I don’t think anybody of my generation became an actor to make money. It never occurred to me. I made £8 a week here [on stage in London]. When I starred in a play at the Royal Court, I made £17 a week, that was in 1964,” he said.

Sutherland in The Dirty Dozen (1967)

Sutherland began playing small roles on British television in the early 1960s, in addition to parts in a few horror films (The Castle of the Living Dead, 1964, and Dr. Terror’s House of Horrors, 1965) and thrillers.

The actor’s breakthrough came in Robert Aldrich’s The Dirty Dozen. When another performer refused one of the director’s requests, according to Sutherland later, Aldrich yelled at him, “You with the big ears—you do it! … He didn’t even know my name.” The film, about a penal military unit of 12 anti-social convicts who train as commandos for a suicide mission during World War II, struck a chord with audiences and became one of the most successful films at the box office in 1967.

In Robert Altman’s M*A*S*H, the anti-military theme is even more explicit. Sutherland and Elliot Gould featured in leading roles in the film about a mobile army surgical hospital, set during the Korean War, but obviously referring to the increasingly unpopular Vietnam conflict. From beginning to end, the film ridicules the military brass and patriotic-“gung ho” attitudes.

In Kelly’s Heroes (Brian Hutton, 1970), with Clint Eastwood, Sutherland played one of his numerous “oddball” roles in the comedy heist film about a unit of American soldiers who plan to rob a French bank of its Nazi gold bars.

Sutherland was not an obvious leading man of the conventional Hollywood variety. “With his long face, droopy eyes, protruding ears and wolfish smile,” notes the New York Times, “the 6-foot-4 Mr. Sutherland was never anyone’s idea of a movie heartthrob.”

Sutherland was notable for his awkwardness, his physical vulnerability, even his diffidence. Jean Walton, in Hollywood Reborn, overstates the issue but legitimately points out that in the 1970s

almost all of his background profiles and interviews include an account of his bodily awkwardness, stemming from a painful self-consciousness at being too tall as a youth, of having “Dumbo” ears, of each day meeting a face in the mirror that even his mother had to admit was not “good-looking” but was at least “full of character.”

M*A*S*H (1970)

However, to his considerable credit, Sutherland won the affection and appreciation of audiences through the obviously intense intelligence and sincerity of his performances. In a comment to the Hollywood Reporter, actress Helen Mirren termed Sutherland “one of the smartest actors I ever worked with … He had a wonderful enquiring brain, and a great knowledge on a wide variety of subjects,” she said. “He combined this great intelligence with a deep sensitivity, and with a seriousness about his profession as an actor.”

Two things are striking about Sutherland’s career in the 1970s and 1980s at least: first, that he sought out what he hoped would be intriguing and unusual material, often with an anti-authoritarian undercurrent; and, second, that there was such material to choose from at the time.

Latest article