But the rehashed plans triggered objections from locals, who argued they misrepresented the proposed building envelopes and underplayed the extent to which the development would obscure prized views of the harbour, Observatory Hill, and heritage streets in Millers Point.
The complaint to the Ombudsman has been lodged by owners in the Highgate apartments, the Millers Point Community Resident Action Group, Hill Thalis Architecture and Urban Projects, the Langham hotel, and Emeritus Professor James Weirick, who is former director of the University of NSW’s graduate program in urban development and design.
The revised designs for Central Barangaroo include fewer offices and more apartments.Credit: NSW government
“We believe Infrastructure NSW has acted improperly in their role with this project by providing misleading and deceptive information to interested parties, as well as the public, with a view to enhancing planning support for the latest Barangaroo development proposal,” the group said.
The complaint said the residents’ group, The Langham and owners in the Highgate building had been “especially critical of distortions in photographic imaging” used to support the development application, and described the “misrepresentations of development scale and related public and private view impacts as ‘unconscionable’ ”.
Loading
The complaint argued Mod 9 should be a new development application subject to a full assessment.
Millers Point resident Judy Hyde said development applications “should not be based on anything other than fact and truth”.
“The government – Infrastructure NSW – has gone into this misrepresenting the facts in the name of the developer, instead of representing the interests of the public.”
Infrastructure NSW denied improper behaviour and said it and Aqualand had “followed the steps required of the planning process”, which included putting the proposal and revisions on exhibition.
“Infrastructure NSW will work collaboratively with the NSW Ombudsman, should it decide to review the claims made.”
The NSW Ombudsman’s office said it did not comment on individual complaints.
Aqualand did not respond to requests for comment. The company has previously said input from the government on the revised plans provided a greater focus on the public dividend through “improved view sharing, more generous public spaces, and greater connectivity through the precinct”.
The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure is considering submissions on the plans before making a recommendation to Planning Minister Paul Scully, who will decide on the proposal.
Millers Point Community Resident Action Group member Bernard Kelly said: “We just hope the minister rejects [the proposal], or refers it to the Independent Planning Commission, so the application gets the full light of day.”
Loading
The Langham hotel on Kent Street is opposing the development because it would block its harbour views. The hotel’s general manager Shane Jolly hoped the complaint to the watchdog would “help to obtain a fair outcome, particularly given the decision lies solely with the planning minister”.
The City of Sydney council, independent Sydney MP Alex Greenwich, the Heritage Council of NSW, and the National Trust’s NSW branch have also objected to the most recent plans for the precinct.
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.